Thornton City Of

PFAS monitoring results for a public water system in Colorado

CO0101150UCMR 5EPA monitoring data
7.1Highest PFOA result, ppt
5Highest PFOS result, ppt
0.594Highest Hazard Index
210Results
PWSID
CO0101150
State
Colorado
System type
community water system (CWS)
Population served
226,465
City
Thornton
Counties
Adams County
Primary source water
surface water
UCMR 5 sampling
2023-02-14 to 2023-11-27 · 2 entry point(s) · water types: SW
Service-area boundary
authoritative

PFOA 1–3 × its limit highest single result
PFOA below its limit worst entry-point average

These are monitoring results collected under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) at entry points, where treated water enters the distribution system; they are not tap-water samples. They are not compliance determinations: compliance with EPA's 2024 PFAS limits is judged on running annual averages of compliance monitoring, required from 2029, so a single UCMR 5 result at or above a limit is not a violation. “< MRL” means the compound was not quantified at EPA's minimum reporting level; it does not mean zero.

Compared with EPA's 2024 values

Highest single resultWorst entry-point average*Limit
PFOA (ppt)7.13.44
PFOS (ppt)52.384
Hazard Index0.5940.2551.0†

“<MRL” = every result for the compound was below its reporting limit. * Mean of all samples at each entry point with non-detects = 0 (EPA compliance convention; the Hazard Index also uses non-detects = 0); a screening comparison, not a formal running annual average. † Rescission proposed May 2026. PFOA/PFOS MCL 4 ppt (2024 NPDWR, in effect). PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA (10 ppt each) and the Hazard Index (1.0) are 2024 NPDWR values; EPA proposed rescinding them on 18 May 2026 (comment period closed 20 Jul 2026).

Compared with Colorado standards

Highest single resultWorst entry-point average*Colorado
PFOA (ppt)7.13.44
PFOS (ppt)52.384
PFNA (ppt)0010
PFHxS (ppt)5.92.5210
HFPO-DA (GenX) (ppt)0010

Sum standards add the listed compounds within each sample (non-detects = 0). State compliance is normally judged on averages over time; these are screening comparisons.

Sampling history

Sampled 2023-02-14 to 2023-11-27 · 2 entry point(s) · water types: SW · 8 sampling visits. PFAS in ppt (ng/L).

DateEntry pointEventPFOAPFOSHIOther detections
2023-02-14Thornton Treatment Plant (SW)SE17.150.594PFBA 10.4, PFHpA 3.7, PFHxA 12.6, PFPeA 12.4, lithium 34 µg/L
2023-05-30Thornton Treatment Plant (SW)SE26.54.50.423PFBA 8.3, PFHpA 3.2, PFHxA 10.4, PFPeA 10, lithium 26.8 µg/L
2023-05-30Wes Brown TP (SW)SE2<4<40.002PFBA 8.7, PFHxA 4.8, PFPeA 8.2, lithium 30.5 µg/L
2023-06-14Thornton Treatment Plant (SW)SE1n/an/an/anone
2023-06-14Wes Brown TP (SW)SE1<4<40.002PFBA 9.6, PFHxA 7.5, PFPeA 8.8, lithium 28.7 µg/L
2023-08-14Thornton Treatment Plant (SW)SE3<4<40.002PFHxA 4.1, PFPeA 4.1, lithium 21.9 µg/L
2023-08-14Wes Brown TP (SW)SE3<4<40.002PFBA 8.1, PFHxA 5.8, PFPeA 7.5, lithium 25.5 µg/L
2023-11-27Thornton Treatment Plant (SW)SE4<4<40.002PFBA 6, PFHxA 5.6, PFPeA 5.5, lithium 21.3 µg/L

“<4” = not detected at the reporting limit shown; “n/a” = not analyzed in that sample. Highlighted = at or above the 4 ppt MCL. HI computed per sample with non-detects as 0. Other detections lists every other quantified compound (lithium in µg/L).

All results by entry point

210 results. Each column is one sampling visit (date and UCMR 5 sample event). A number is a measured concentration; “< 4” = below the minimum reporting level shown; “–” = not analyzed in that visit. PFAS in ppt (ng/L); lithium in µg/L.

Thornton Treatment Plant facility 022 · sample point 022 · surface water

CompoundMRL2023-02-14
SE1
2023-05-30
SE2
2023-06-14
SE1
2023-08-14
SE3
2023-11-27
SE4
PFBA5 ppt10.48.3–< 56
PFBS3 ppt8.17.1–3.14.2
PFHpA3 ppt3.73.2–< 3< 3
PFHxA3 ppt12.610.4–4.15.6
PFHxS3 ppt5.94.2–< 3< 3
PFOA4 ppt7.16.5–< 4< 4
PFOS4 ppt54.5–< 4< 4
PFPeA3 ppt12.410–4.15.5
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5–< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5–< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5–< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2–< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5–< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt–< 5< 5< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20–< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt–< 6< 6< 6< 6
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4–< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt< 4< 4–< 4< 4
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4–< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt–< 8< 8< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt–< 7< 7< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2–< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L3426.8–21.921.3

Wes Brown TP facility 00001 · sample point 00001 · surface water

CompoundMRL2023-05-30
SE2
2023-06-14
SE1
2023-08-14
SE3
PFBA5 ppt8.79.68.1
PFBS3 ppt3.24.83.6
PFHxA3 ppt4.87.55.8
PFPeA3 ppt8.28.87.5
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6< 6
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3< 3
PFHpA3 ppt< 3< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3< 3
PFHxS3 ppt< 3< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt< 4< 4< 4
PFOA4 ppt< 4< 4< 4
PFOS4 ppt< 4< 4< 4
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L30.528.725.5

Statistics by compound

CompoundResultsDetectedHighest (date)Mean boundsKM medianP75P90P95
PFBS7100%8.1
2023-02-14
4.87–4.874.27.18.18.1
PFHxA7100%12.6
2023-02-14
7.26–7.265.810.412.612.6
PFPeA7100%12.4
2023-02-14
8.07–8.078.21012.412.4
lithium7100%34
2023-02-14
26.96–26.9626.830.53434
PFBA786%10.4
2023-02-14
7.3–8.018.39.610.410.4
PFHpA729%3.7
2023-02-14
0.99–3.13<MRL3.23.73.7
PFHxS729%5.9
2023-02-14
1.44–3.59<MRL4.25.95.9
PFOA729%7.1
2023-02-14
1.94–4.8<MRL6.57.17.1
PFOS729%5
2023-02-14
1.36–4.21<MRL4.555

Never detected (21): 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, NEtFOSAA, NFDHA, NMeFOSAA, PFDA, PFDoA, PFEESA, PFHpS, PFMBA, PFMPA, PFNA, PFPeS, PFTA, PFTrDA, PFUnA.

Left-censored Kaplan–Meier statistics (Helsel 2005; Helsel & Lee 2006, NADA for R). Units: ppt; lithium µg/L. Each compound has one reporting limit, so the Kaplan–Meier mean equals the upper mean bound (non-detects at the MRL); the lower bound sets non-detects to 0. “<MRL” = the percentile falls below the reporting limit and cannot be estimated. These describe this system's UCMR 5 samples, not population estimates.

Sources

  • EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data text files (UCMR5_All.txt; samples 2023-01-03 to 2026-05-07; data summary dated Jul 2026)
  • EPA SDWIS via ECHO SDWA downloads, quarter 2026Q3
  • EPA Public Water System Service Areas v3 (Mar 2026)
  • US Census Bureau cartographic boundary counties 1:500k, 2024
  • EPA/USGS NHDPlus V2 (medium resolution) flowlines, Strahler order 2+

Data build e835c17dd18b · 2026-10-18T04:06Z · UCMR 5 release Jul2026 · SDWIS 2026Q3. Data and methods.