Carolina Beach Water System

PFAS monitoring results for a public water system in North Carolina

NC0465015UCMR 5EPA monitoring data
<MRLHighest PFOA result, ppt
<MRLHighest PFOS result, ppt
0Highest Hazard Index
355Results
PWSID
NC0465015
State
North Carolina
System type
community water system (CWS)
Population served
6,864
City
Carolina Beach
Counties
New Hanover County
Primary source water
groundwater
UCMR 5 sampling
2024-06-18 to 2024-12-10 · 8 entry point(s) · water types: GW
Service-area boundary
authoritative

No PFAS detected highest single result
No PFAS detected worst entry-point average

These are monitoring results collected under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) at entry points, where treated water enters the distribution system; they are not tap-water samples. They are not compliance determinations: compliance with EPA's 2024 PFAS limits is judged on running annual averages of compliance monitoring, required from 2029, so a single UCMR 5 result at or above a limit is not a violation. “< MRL” means the compound was not quantified at EPA's minimum reporting level; it does not mean zero.

Compared with EPA's 2024 values

Highest single resultWorst entry-point average*Limit
PFOA (ppt)<MRL04
PFOS (ppt)<MRL04
Hazard Index001.0†

“<MRL” = every result for the compound was below its reporting limit. * Mean of all samples at each entry point with non-detects = 0 (EPA compliance convention; the Hazard Index also uses non-detects = 0); a screening comparison, not a formal running annual average. † Rescission proposed May 2026. PFOA/PFOS MCL 4 ppt (2024 NPDWR, in effect). PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA (10 ppt each) and the Hazard Index (1.0) are 2024 NPDWR values; EPA proposed rescinding them on 18 May 2026 (comment period closed 20 Jul 2026).

No North Carolina PFAS drinking-water standard in effect or proposed as of 2026-10-17: No state PFAS drinking-water MCL in effect; S.B. 384 (2025) filed, not enacted; DEQ implementing federal NPDWR.

Sampling history

Sampled 2024-06-18 to 2024-12-10 · 8 entry point(s) · water types: GW · 17 sampling visits. PFAS in ppt (ng/L).

DateEntry pointEventPFOAPFOSHIOther detections
2024-06-18Plant #1 (GW)SE1n/an/an/alithium 9 µg/L
2024-06-18Plant #2 (GW)SE1n/an/an/alithium 17.1 µg/L
2024-06-18Well #10 (GW)SE1<4<40lithium 10.1 µg/L
2024-06-18Well #11 (GW)SE1<4<40none
2024-06-18Well #12 (GW)SE1n/an/an/alithium 13.3 µg/L
2024-06-18Well #2 (GW)SE1<4<40lithium 10.5 µg/L
2024-06-18Well #3 (GW)SE1<4<40lithium 19.2 µg/L
2024-06-18Well #9 (GW)SE1<4<40none
2024-08-15Plant #1 (GW)SE1<4<40none
2024-12-10Plant #1 (GW)SE2<4<40none
2024-12-10Plant #2 (GW)SE2n/an/an/anone
2024-12-10Well #10 (GW)SE2<4<40none
2024-12-10Well #11 (GW)SE2<4<40none
2024-12-10Well #12 (GW)SE2n/an/an/alithium 10.2 µg/L
2024-12-10Well #2 (GW)SE2n/an/an/anone
2024-12-10Well #3 (GW)SE2<4<40lithium 18.3 µg/L
2024-12-10Well #9 (GW)SE2<4<40none

“<4” = not detected at the reporting limit shown; “n/a” = not analyzed in that sample. Highlighted = at or above the 4 ppt MCL. HI computed per sample with non-detects as 0. Other detections lists every other quantified compound (lithium in µg/L).

All results by entry point

355 results. Each column is one sampling visit (date and UCMR 5 sample event). A number is a measured concentration; “< 4” = below the minimum reporting level shown; “–” = not analyzed in that visit. PFAS in ppt (ng/L); lithium in µg/L.

Plant #1 facility 00021 · sample point EP021 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2024-06-18
SE1
2024-08-15
SE1
2024-12-10
SE2
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt–< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt–< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt–< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt–< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt–< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt–< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt–< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5–< 5
NFDHA20 ppt–< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6–< 6
PFBA5 ppt–< 5< 5
PFBS3 ppt–< 3< 3
PFDA3 ppt–< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt–< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt–< 3< 3
PFHpA3 ppt–< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt–< 3< 3
PFHxA3 ppt–< 3< 3
PFHxS3 ppt–< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt–< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt–< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt–< 4< 4
PFOA4 ppt–< 4< 4
PFOS4 ppt–< 4< 4
PFPeA3 ppt–< 3< 3
PFPeS4 ppt–< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8–< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7–< 7
PFUnA2 ppt–< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L9–< 9

Plant #2 facility 00022 · sample point EP022 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2024-06-18
SE1
2024-12-10
SE2
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
lithium9 µg/L17.1< 9

Well #10 facility 00010 · sample point EP010 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2024-06-18
SE1
2024-12-10
SE2
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFBA5 ppt< 5< 5
PFBS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFPeA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L10.1< 9

Well #11 facility 00011 · sample point EP011 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2024-06-18
SE1
2024-12-10
SE2
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFBA5 ppt< 5< 5
PFBS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFPeA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L< 9< 9

Well #12 facility 00012 · sample point EP012 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2024-06-18
SE1
2024-12-10
SE2
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
lithium9 µg/L13.310.2

Well #2 facility 00002 · sample point EP002 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2024-06-18
SE1
2024-12-10
SE2
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5–
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3–
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5–
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5–
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2–
ADONA3 ppt< 3–
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5–
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20–
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFBA5 ppt< 5–
PFBS3 ppt< 3–
PFDA3 ppt< 3–
PFDoA3 ppt< 3–
PFEESA3 ppt< 3–
PFHpA3 ppt< 3–
PFHpS3 ppt< 3–
PFHxA3 ppt< 3–
PFHxS3 ppt< 3–
PFMBA3 ppt< 3–
PFMPA4 ppt< 4–
PFNA4 ppt< 4–
PFOA4 ppt< 4–
PFOS4 ppt< 4–
PFPeA3 ppt< 3–
PFPeS4 ppt< 4–
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2–
lithium9 µg/L10.5< 9

Well #3 facility 00003 · sample point EP003 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2024-06-18
SE1
2024-12-10
SE2
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFBA5 ppt< 5< 5
PFBS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFPeA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L19.218.3

Well #9 facility 00009 · sample point EP009 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2024-06-18
SE1
2024-12-10
SE2
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFBA5 ppt< 5< 5
PFBS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFPeA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L< 9< 9

Statistics by compound

CompoundResultsDetectedHighest (date)Mean boundsKM medianP75P90P95
lithium1650%19.2
2024-06-18
6.73–11.23<MRL10.518.319.2

Never detected (29): 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, NEtFOSAA, NFDHA, NMeFOSAA, PFBA, PFBS, PFDA, PFDoA, PFEESA, PFHpA, PFHpS, PFHxA, PFHxS, PFMBA, PFMPA, PFNA, PFOA, PFOS, PFPeA, PFPeS, PFTA, PFTrDA, PFUnA.

Left-censored Kaplan–Meier statistics (Helsel 2005; Helsel & Lee 2006, NADA for R). Units: ppt; lithium µg/L. Each compound has one reporting limit, so the Kaplan–Meier mean equals the upper mean bound (non-detects at the MRL); the lower bound sets non-detects to 0. “<MRL” = the percentile falls below the reporting limit and cannot be estimated. These describe this system's UCMR 5 samples, not population estimates.

Sources

  • EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data text files (UCMR5_All.txt; samples 2023-01-09 to 2026-06-03; data summary dated Jul 2026)
  • EPA SDWIS via ECHO SDWA downloads, quarter 2026Q3
  • EPA Public Water System Service Areas v3 (Mar 2026)
  • US Census Bureau cartographic boundary counties 1:500k, 2024
  • EPA/USGS NHDPlus V2 (medium resolution) flowlines, Strahler order 2+

Data build 06b855374275 · 2026-10-18T04:10Z · UCMR 5 release Jul2026 · SDWIS 2026Q3. Data and methods.