Brooklyn Park

PFAS monitoring results for a public water system in Minnesota

MN1270005UCMR 5EPA monitoring data
10.5Highest PFOA result, ppt
9.5Highest PFOS result, ppt
0.48Highest Hazard Index
300Results
PWSID
MN1270005
State
Minnesota
System type
community water system (CWS)
Population served
89,995
City
Brooklyn Park
Counties
Hennepin County
Primary source water
groundwater
UCMR 5 sampling
2024-11-13 to 2025-04-08 · 5 entry point(s) · water types: GW
Service-area boundary
authoritative

PFOA 1–3 × its limit highest single result
PFOA 1–3 × its limit worst entry-point average

These are monitoring results collected under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) at entry points, where treated water enters the distribution system; they are not tap-water samples. They are not compliance determinations: compliance with EPA's 2024 PFAS limits is judged on running annual averages of compliance monitoring, required from 2029, so a single UCMR 5 result at or above a limit is not a violation. “< MRL” means the compound was not quantified at EPA's minimum reporting level; it does not mean zero.

Water purchased from

  • Osseo (MN1270042)
    Seller not monitored under UCMR 5.
  • Brooklyn Center (MN1270004)
    Seller's highest results: PFOA <MRL · PFOS 6 ppt · HI 0.59 · detected: PFBA;PFHxS;PFOS
  • Maple Grove (MN1270020)
    Seller's highest results: PFOA <MRL · PFOS <MRL · HI 0 · detected: PFBA
  • Champlin (MN1270006)
    Seller's highest results: PFOA <MRL · PFOS <MRL · HI 0

Seller results are the seller's own entry-point samples, not measurements of this system's water. This system's own samples (below) may reflect purchased water, its own sources, or both.

Compared with EPA's 2024 values

Highest single resultWorst entry-point average*Limit
PFOA (ppt)10.510.054
PFOS (ppt)9.59.454
Hazard Index0.480.4751.0†

“<MRL” = every result for the compound was below its reporting limit. * Mean of all samples at each entry point with non-detects = 0 (EPA compliance convention; the Hazard Index also uses non-detects = 0); a screening comparison, not a formal running annual average. † Rescission proposed May 2026. PFOA/PFOS MCL 4 ppt (2024 NPDWR, in effect). PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA (10 ppt each) and the Hazard Index (1.0) are 2024 NPDWR values; EPA proposed rescinding them on 18 May 2026 (comment period closed 20 Jul 2026).

Compared with Minnesota guidance levels

Highest single resultWorst entry-point average*Minnesota
PFOA (ppt)10.510.050.01 (guidance)
PFOS (ppt)9.59.452.3 (guidance)
PFHxS (ppt)4.84.7547 (guidance)
PFBS (ppt)3.21.6100 (guidance)
PFHxA (ppt)00200 (guidance)
PFBA (ppt)24.424.057,000 (guidance)

Sum standards add the listed compounds within each sample (non-detects = 0). State compliance is normally judged on averages over time; these are screening comparisons.

Sampling history

Sampled 2024-11-13 to 2025-04-08 · 5 entry point(s) · water types: GW · 10 sampling visits. PFAS in ppt (ng/L).

DateEntry pointEventPFOAPFOSHIOther detections
2024-11-13TREATMENT PLANT #1 (GW)SE1<4<40.33PFBA 24.4
2024-11-13Well #11 Entry Point (GW)SE110.59.40.37PFBA 20.6, lithium 9 µg/L
2024-11-13Well #12 Entry Point (GW)SE1<4<40.48PFBA 14.2
2024-11-13Well #2 Entry Point (GW)SE1<4<40none
2024-11-13Well #3 Entry Point (GW)SE1<4<40PFBA 10.8
2025-04-08TREATMENT PLANT #1 (GW)SE2<440.422PFBA 23.7, lithium 9.1 µg/L
2025-04-08Well #11 Entry Point (GW)SE29.69.50.37PFBA 18.5, lithium 11.7 µg/L
2025-04-08Well #12 Entry Point (GW)SE2<4<40.47PFBA 12.2
2025-04-08Well #2 Entry Point (GW)SE2<4<40lithium 9.4 µg/L
2025-04-08Well #3 Entry Point (GW)SE2<4<40PFBA 9.6

“<4” = not detected at the reporting limit shown; “n/a” = not analyzed in that sample. Highlighted = at or above the 4 ppt MCL. HI computed per sample with non-detects as 0. Other detections lists every other quantified compound (lithium in µg/L).

All results by entry point

300 results. Each column is one sampling visit (date and UCMR 5 sample event). A number is a measured concentration; “< 4” = below the minimum reporting level shown; “–” = not analyzed in that visit. PFAS in ppt (ng/L); lithium in µg/L.

TREATMENT PLANT #1 facility 21 · sample point E01 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2024-11-13
SE1
2025-04-08
SE2
PFBA5 ppt24.423.7
PFBS3 ppt< 33.2
PFHxS3 ppt3.34.2
PFOS4 ppt< 44
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFPeA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L< 99.1

Well #11 Entry Point facility 23 · sample point E10 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2024-11-13
SE1
2025-04-08
SE2
PFBA5 ppt20.618.5
PFHxS3 ppt3.73.7
PFOA4 ppt10.59.6
PFOS4 ppt9.49.5
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFBS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFPeA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L911.7

Well #12 Entry Point facility 24 · sample point E11 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2024-11-13
SE1
2025-04-08
SE2
PFBA5 ppt14.212.2
PFHxS3 ppt4.84.7
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFBS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFPeA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L< 9< 9

Well #2 Entry Point facility 26 · sample point E03 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2024-11-13
SE1
2025-04-08
SE2
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFBA5 ppt< 5< 5
PFBS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFPeA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L< 99.4

Well #3 Entry Point facility 27 · sample point E04 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2024-11-13
SE1
2025-04-08
SE2
PFBA5 ppt10.89.6
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFBS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFPeA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L< 9< 9

Statistics by compound

CompoundResultsDetectedHighest (date)Mean boundsKM medianP75P90P95
PFBA1080%24.4
2024-11-13
13.4–14.412.220.623.724.4
PFHxS1060%4.8
2024-11-13
2.44–3.643.34.24.74.8
lithium1040%11.7
2025-04-08
3.92–9.32<MRL9.19.411.7
PFOS1030%9.5
2025-04-08
2.29–5.09<MRL49.49.5
PFOA1020%10.5
2024-11-13
2.01–5.21<MRL<MRL9.610.5
PFBS1010%3.2
2025-04-08
0.32–3.02<MRL<MRL<MRL3.2

Never detected (24): 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, NEtFOSAA, NFDHA, NMeFOSAA, PFDA, PFDoA, PFEESA, PFHpA, PFHpS, PFHxA, PFMBA, PFMPA, PFNA, PFPeA, PFPeS, PFTA, PFTrDA, PFUnA.

Left-censored Kaplan–Meier statistics (Helsel 2005; Helsel & Lee 2006, NADA for R). Units: ppt; lithium µg/L. Each compound has one reporting limit, so the Kaplan–Meier mean equals the upper mean bound (non-detects at the MRL); the lower bound sets non-detects to 0. “<MRL” = the percentile falls below the reporting limit and cannot be estimated. These describe this system's UCMR 5 samples, not population estimates.

Sources

  • EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data text files (UCMR5_All.txt; samples 2023-01-04 to 2026-02-23; data summary dated Jul 2026)
  • EPA SDWIS via ECHO SDWA downloads, quarter 2026Q3
  • EPA Public Water System Service Areas v3 (Mar 2026)
  • US Census Bureau cartographic boundary counties 1:500k, 2024
  • EPA/USGS NHDPlus V2 (medium resolution) flowlines, Strahler order 2+

Data build b4430eb8fd55 · 2026-10-18T04:07Z · UCMR 5 release Jul2026 · SDWIS 2026Q3. Data and methods.