Hanover Water Dept

PFAS monitoring results for a public water system in Massachusetts

MA4122000UCMR 5EPA monitoring data
8.9Highest PFOA result, ppt
11.4Highest PFOS result, ppt
0.003Highest Hazard Index
180Results
PWSID
MA4122000
State
Massachusetts
System type
community water system (CWS)
Population served
14,984
City
Hanover
Counties
Plymouth County
Primary source water
groundwater under the influence of surface water
UCMR 5 sampling
2023-08-22 to 2024-04-11 · 3 entry point(s) · water types: GW
Service-area boundary
authoritative

PFOS 1–3 × its limit highest single result
PFOS 1–3 × its limit worst entry-point average

These are monitoring results collected under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) at entry points, where treated water enters the distribution system; they are not tap-water samples. They are not compliance determinations: compliance with EPA's 2024 PFAS limits is judged on running annual averages of compliance monitoring, required from 2029, so a single UCMR 5 result at or above a limit is not a violation. “< MRL” means the compound was not quantified at EPA's minimum reporting level; it does not mean zero.

Compared with EPA's 2024 values

Highest single resultWorst entry-point average*Limit
PFOA (ppt)8.95.354
PFOS (ppt)11.47.94
Hazard Index0.0030.0021.0†

“<MRL” = every result for the compound was below its reporting limit. * Mean of all samples at each entry point with non-detects = 0 (EPA compliance convention; the Hazard Index also uses non-detects = 0); a screening comparison, not a formal running annual average. † Rescission proposed May 2026. PFOA/PFOS MCL 4 ppt (2024 NPDWR, in effect). PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA (10 ppt each) and the Hazard Index (1.0) are 2024 NPDWR values; EPA proposed rescinding them on 18 May 2026 (comment period closed 20 Jul 2026).

Compared with Massachusetts standards

Highest single resultWorst entry-point average*Massachusetts
PFAS6 (sum) (ppt)23.814.120

Sum standards add the listed compounds within each sample (non-detects = 0). State compliance is normally judged on averages over time; these are screening comparisons.

Sampling history

Sampled 2023-08-22 to 2024-04-11 · 3 entry point(s) · water types: GW · 6 sampling visits. PFAS in ppt (ng/L).

DateEntry pointEventPFOAPFOSHIOther detections
2023-08-22Broadway TP (GW)SE15.2<40PFHxA 3.7, PFPeA 3.8
2023-08-22Philip Beal TP (GW)SE1<4<40PFHxA 4.3, PFPeA 5.5, lithium 9.58 µg/L
2023-08-22Pond Street TP (GW)SE18.911.40.003PFBA 8, PFHpA 3.5, PFHxA 8.6, PFPeA 11.6
2024-04-11Broadway TP (GW)SE25.5<40PFHxA 4.2, PFPeA 4.7
2024-04-11Philip Beal TP (GW)SE2<4<40PFHxA 4.5, PFPeA 5.9, lithium 9.53 µg/L
2024-04-11Pond Street TP (GW)SE2<44.40.002none

“<4” = not detected at the reporting limit shown; “n/a” = not analyzed in that sample. Highlighted = at or above the 4 ppt MCL. HI computed per sample with non-detects as 0. Other detections lists every other quantified compound (lithium in µg/L).

All results by entry point

180 results. Each column is one sampling visit (date and UCMR 5 sample event). A number is a measured concentration; “< 4” = below the minimum reporting level shown; “–” = not analyzed in that visit. PFAS in ppt (ng/L); lithium in µg/L.

Broadway TP facility 45000 · sample point 40000 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2023-08-22
SE1
2024-04-11
SE2
PFHxA3 ppt3.74.2
PFOA4 ppt5.25.5
PFPeA3 ppt3.84.7
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFBA5 ppt< 5< 5
PFBS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L< 9< 9

Philip Beal TP facility 00031 · sample point 20748 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2023-08-22
SE1
2024-04-11
SE2
PFHxA3 ppt4.34.5
PFPeA3 ppt5.55.9
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFBA5 ppt< 5< 5
PFBS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFOS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L9.589.53

Pond Street TP facility 00022 · sample point 15682 · groundwater

CompoundMRL2023-08-22
SE1
2024-04-11
SE2
PFBA5 ppt8< 5
PFBS3 ppt6.63
PFHpA3 ppt3.5< 3
PFHxA3 ppt8.6< 3
PFOA4 ppt8.9< 4
PFOS4 ppt11.44.4
PFPeA3 ppt11.6< 3
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFHxS3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFNA4 ppt< 4< 4
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2
lithium9 µg/L< 9< 9

Statistics by compound

CompoundResultsDetectedHighest (date)Mean boundsKM medianP75P90P95
PFHxA683%8.6
2023-08-22
4.22–4.724.24.58.68.6
PFPeA683%11.6
2023-08-22
5.25–5.754.75.911.611.6
PFOA650%8.9
2023-08-22
3.27–5.27<MRL5.58.98.9
PFBS633%6.6
2023-08-22
1.6–3.6<MRL36.66.6
PFOS633%11.4
2023-08-22
2.63–5.3<MRL4.411.411.4
lithium633%9.58
2023-08-22
3.19–9.19<MRL9.539.589.58
PFBA617%8
2023-08-22
1.33–5.5<MRL<MRL88
PFHpA617%3.5
2023-08-22
0.58–3.08<MRL<MRL3.53.5

Never detected (22): 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, NEtFOSAA, NFDHA, NMeFOSAA, PFDA, PFDoA, PFEESA, PFHpS, PFHxS, PFMBA, PFMPA, PFNA, PFPeS, PFTA, PFTrDA, PFUnA.

Left-censored Kaplan–Meier statistics (Helsel 2005; Helsel & Lee 2006, NADA for R). Units: ppt; lithium µg/L. Each compound has one reporting limit, so the Kaplan–Meier mean equals the upper mean bound (non-detects at the MRL); the lower bound sets non-detects to 0. “<MRL” = the percentile falls below the reporting limit and cannot be estimated. These describe this system's UCMR 5 samples, not population estimates.

Sources

  • EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data text files (UCMR5_All.txt; samples 2023-01-09 to 2026-05-28; data summary dated Jul 2026)
  • EPA SDWIS via ECHO SDWA downloads, quarter 2026Q3
  • EPA Public Water System Service Areas v3 (Mar 2026)
  • US Census Bureau cartographic boundary counties 1:500k, 2024
  • EPA/USGS NHDPlus V2 (medium resolution) flowlines, Strahler order 2+

Data build a6eeb89a233e · 2026-10-18T04:09Z · UCMR 5 release Jul2026 · SDWIS 2026Q3. Data and methods.