Veolia Water Delaware, Inc

PFAS monitoring results for a public water system in Delaware

DE0000564UCMR 5EPA monitoring data
24.4Highest PFOA result, ppt
<MRLHighest PFOS result, ppt
1.162Highest Hazard Index
240Results
PWSID
DE0000564
State
Delaware
System type
community water system (CWS)
Population served
100,495
City
Wilmington
Counties
New Castle County
Primary source water
surface water
UCMR 5 sampling
2023-02-08 to 2023-12-11 · 2 entry point(s) · water types: SW
Service-area boundary
authoritative

PFOA ≥ 3 × its limit highest single result
PFOA ≥ 3 × its limit worst entry-point average

These are monitoring results collected under EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) at entry points, where treated water enters the distribution system; they are not tap-water samples. They are not compliance determinations: compliance with EPA's 2024 PFAS limits is judged on running annual averages of compliance monitoring, required from 2029, so a single UCMR 5 result at or above a limit is not a violation. “< MRL” means the compound was not quantified at EPA's minimum reporting level; it does not mean zero.

Water purchased from

  • Newark Water Department (DE0000630)
    Seller's highest results: PFOA 25.3 ppt · PFOS 7.5 ppt · HI 0.553 · detected: PFBA;PFBS;PFHpA;PFHxA;PFHxS;PFOA;PFOS;PFPeA
  • Wilmington Water Department (DE0000663)
    Seller's highest results: PFOA 9.9 ppt · PFOS <MRL · HI 0.002 · detected: PFBA;PFBS;PFHpA;PFHxA;PFOA;PFPeA
  • Chester Water Authority (PA1230004)
    Seller's highest results: PFOA 5.1 ppt · PFOS <MRL · HI 0.002 · detected: PFBS;PFHxA;PFOA;PFPeA

Seller results are the seller's own entry-point samples, not measurements of this system's water. This system's own samples (below) may reflect purchased water, its own sources, or both.

Compared with EPA's 2024 values

Highest single resultWorst entry-point average*Limit
PFOA (ppt)24.419.34
PFOS (ppt)<MRL04
Hazard Index1.1620.8441.0†

“<MRL” = every result for the compound was below its reporting limit. * Mean of all samples at each entry point with non-detects = 0 (EPA compliance convention; the Hazard Index also uses non-detects = 0); a screening comparison, not a formal running annual average. † Rescission proposed May 2026. PFOA/PFOS MCL 4 ppt (2024 NPDWR, in effect). PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA (10 ppt each) and the Hazard Index (1.0) are 2024 NPDWR values; EPA proposed rescinding them on 18 May 2026 (comment period closed 20 Jul 2026).

Compared with Delaware standards

Highest single resultWorst entry-point average*Delaware
PFOA (ppt)24.419.34
PFOS (ppt)004
PFNA (ppt)11.68.4310
PFHxS (ppt)0010
HFPO-DA (GenX) (ppt)0010

Sum standards add the listed compounds within each sample (non-detects = 0). State compliance is normally judged on averages over time; these are screening comparisons.

Sampling history

Sampled 2023-02-08 to 2023-12-11 · 2 entry point(s) · water types: SW · 12 sampling visits. PFAS in ppt (ng/L).

DateEntry pointEventPFOAPFOSHIOther detections
2023-02-08Stanton Plant- North (SW)SE119.1<40.682PFBA 26.9, PFHpA 19.8, PFHxA 22.5, PFPeA 21.7
2023-02-08Stanton Plant- South (SW)SE118.9<40.632PFBA 25.6, PFHpA 19, PFHxA 22, PFPeA 20.8
2023-05-10Stanton Plant- North (SW)SE220.9<40.762PFBA 27.3, PFHpA 20, PFHxA 23.7, PFPeA 22.7
2023-05-10Stanton Plant- South (SW)SE219.4<40.752PFBA 27, PFHpA 20, PFHxA 23.8, PFPeA 23.2
2023-08-15Stanton Plant- North (SW)SE3n/an/an/anone
2023-08-15Stanton Plant- South (SW)SE3n/an/an/anone
2023-10-26Stanton Plant- North (SW)SE323.7<41.002PFBA 39.8, PFHpA 27.2, PFHxA 30.1, PFPeA 30.9
2023-10-26Stanton Plant- South (SW)SE324.4<41.162PFBA 40.6, PFDA 3.1, PFHpA 27.7, PFHxA 31.7, PFPeA 32.1
2023-11-14Stanton Plant- North (SW)SE4n/an/an/anone
2023-11-14Stanton Plant- South (SW)SE4n/an/an/anone
2023-12-11Stanton Plant- North (SW)SE413.5<40.75PFBA 24.2, PFDA 4.7, PFHpA 11.2, PFHxA 14.3, PFPeA 15.7, PFUnA 3.4
2023-12-11Stanton Plant- South (SW)SE413.4<40.83PFBA 24.4, PFDA 4.6, PFHpA 11.7, PFHxA 14.8, PFPeA 15.5, PFUnA 3.8

“<4” = not detected at the reporting limit shown; “n/a” = not analyzed in that sample. Highlighted = at or above the 4 ppt MCL. HI computed per sample with non-detects as 0. Other detections lists every other quantified compound (lithium in µg/L).

All results by entry point

240 results. Each column is one sampling visit (date and UCMR 5 sample event). A number is a measured concentration; “< 4” = below the minimum reporting level shown; “–” = not analyzed in that visit. PFAS in ppt (ng/L); lithium in µg/L.

Stanton Plant- North facility 90003 · sample point DEP003 · surface water

CompoundMRL2023-02-08
SE1
2023-05-10
SE2
2023-08-15
SE3
2023-10-26
SE3
2023-11-14
SE4
2023-12-11
SE4
PFBA5 ppt26.927.3–39.8–24.2
PFBS3 ppt3.73.4–3.4–< 3
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–4.7
PFHpA3 ppt19.820–27.2–11.2
PFHxA3 ppt22.523.7–30.1–14.3
PFNA4 ppt6.87.6–10–7.5
PFOA4 ppt19.120.9–23.7–13.5
PFPeA3 ppt21.722.7–30.9–15.7
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2–< 2–3.4
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5–< 5–< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5–< 5–< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5–< 5–< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2–< 2–< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5–< 5–< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5< 5–< 5–
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20–< 20–< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6< 6–< 6–
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–< 3
PFHxS3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4–< 4–< 4
PFOS4 ppt< 4< 4–< 4–< 4
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4–< 4–< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8< 8–< 8–
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7< 7–< 7–
lithium9 µg/L< 9< 9< 9–< 9–

Stanton Plant- South facility 90002 · sample point DEP002 · surface water

CompoundMRL2023-02-08
SE1
2023-05-10
SE2
2023-08-15
SE3
2023-10-26
SE3
2023-11-14
SE4
2023-12-11
SE4
PFBA5 ppt25.627–40.6–24.4
PFBS3 ppt3.43.4–3.4–< 3
PFDA3 ppt< 3< 3–3.1–4.6
PFHpA3 ppt1920–27.7–11.7
PFHxA3 ppt2223.8–31.7–14.8
PFNA4 ppt6.37.5–11.6–8.3
PFOA4 ppt18.919.4–24.4–13.4
PFPeA3 ppt20.823.2–32.1–15.5
PFUnA2 ppt< 2< 2–< 2–3.8
11Cl-PF3OUdS5 ppt< 5< 5–< 5–< 5
4:2 FTS3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–< 3
6:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5–< 5–< 5
8:2 FTS5 ppt< 5< 5–< 5–< 5
9Cl-PF3ONS2 ppt< 2< 2–< 2–< 2
ADONA3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–< 3
HFPO-DA5 ppt< 5< 5–< 5–< 5
NEtFOSAA5 ppt< 5< 5< 5–< 5–
NFDHA20 ppt< 20< 20–< 20–< 20
NMeFOSAA6 ppt< 6< 6< 6–< 6–
PFDoA3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–< 3
PFEESA3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–< 3
PFHpS3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–< 3
PFHxS3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–< 3
PFMBA3 ppt< 3< 3–< 3–< 3
PFMPA4 ppt< 4< 4–< 4–< 4
PFOS4 ppt< 4< 4–< 4–< 4
PFPeS4 ppt< 4< 4–< 4–< 4
PFTA8 ppt< 8< 8< 8–< 8–
PFTrDA7 ppt< 7< 7< 7–< 7–
lithium9 µg/L< 9< 9< 9–< 9–

Statistics by compound

CompoundResultsDetectedHighest (date)Mean boundsKM medianP75P90P95
PFBA8100%40.6
2023-10-26
29.48–29.4826.927.340.640.6
PFHpA8100%27.7
2023-10-26
19.57–19.5719.82027.727.7
PFHxA8100%31.7
2023-10-26
22.86–22.8622.523.831.731.7
PFNA8100%11.6
2023-10-26
8.2–8.27.58.311.611.6
PFOA8100%24.4
2023-10-26
19.16–19.1619.120.924.424.4
PFPeA8100%32.1
2023-10-26
22.82–22.8221.723.232.132.1
PFBS875%3.7
2023-02-08
2.59–3.343.43.43.73.7
PFDA838%4.7
2023-12-11
1.55–3.42<MRL3.14.74.7
PFUnA825%3.8
2023-12-11
0.9–2.4<MRL<MRL3.83.8

Never detected (21): 11Cl-PF3OUdS, 4:2 FTS, 6:2 FTS, 8:2 FTS, 9Cl-PF3ONS, ADONA, HFPO-DA, NEtFOSAA, NFDHA, NMeFOSAA, PFDoA, PFEESA, PFHpS, PFHxS, PFMBA, PFMPA, PFOS, PFPeS, PFTA, PFTrDA, lithium.

Left-censored Kaplan–Meier statistics (Helsel 2005; Helsel & Lee 2006, NADA for R). Units: ppt; lithium µg/L. Each compound has one reporting limit, so the Kaplan–Meier mean equals the upper mean bound (non-detects at the MRL); the lower bound sets non-detects to 0. “<MRL” = the percentile falls below the reporting limit and cannot be estimated. These describe this system's UCMR 5 samples, not population estimates.

Sources

  • EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data text files (UCMR5_All.txt; samples 2023-01-11 to 2025-10-22; data summary dated Jul 2026)
  • EPA SDWIS via ECHO SDWA downloads, quarter 2026Q3
  • EPA Public Water System Service Areas v3 (Mar 2026)
  • US Census Bureau cartographic boundary counties 1:500k, 2024
  • EPA/USGS NHDPlus V2 (medium resolution) flowlines, Strahler order 2+

Data build ff8be640d9aa · 2026-10-18T04:03Z · UCMR 5 release Jul2026 · SDWIS 2026Q3. Data and methods.